Home About us Editorial board Browse Articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 33
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9

Construction of calibration curve for premature chromosome condensation assay for dose assessment


Laboratory of the Genetical Research and Biodosimetry, Nikiforov Russian Center for Emergency and Radiation Medicine (EMERCOM of Russia), Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Date of Web Publication30-Dec-2016

Correspondence Address:
Elizaveta G Neronova
Lebedeva Str., 4/2, Saint-Petersburg, 194044
Russia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2041-9414.197166

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Cytogenetic dosimetry plays an important role in the triage and medical management of affected people in radiological incidents/accidents. Cytogenetic biodosimetry uses different methods to estimate the absorbed dose in the exposed individuals, and each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay presents several advantages that hopefully fulfill the gaps identified in the other cytogenetic methods. To introduce this technique into the panel of other cytogenetic methods, a calibration curve for PCC after γ-irradiation was generated for our laboratory.

Keywords: γ-irradiation, biological dosimetry, calibration curve, premature chromosome condensation


How to cite this article:
Neronova EG. Construction of calibration curve for premature chromosome condensation assay for dose assessment. Genome Integr 2016;7:9

How to cite this URL:
Neronova EG. Construction of calibration curve for premature chromosome condensation assay for dose assessment. Genome Integr [serial online] 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 18];7:9. Available from: http://www.genome-integrity.org/text.asp?2016/7/1/9/197166


  Introduction Top


Cytogenetic dosimetry plays an important role in the triage and medical management of radiological casualties. Cytogenetic biodosimetry uses different end-points (unstable and stable aberrations, micronuclei, premature chromosome condensation [PCC] aberrations) to estimate the absorbed dose in the exposed individuals and each method has its advantages and disadvantages.[1] Dicentric (unstable aberrations) and translocation (stable aberrations) analysis are based on the investigation of chromosome damages in phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) - stimulated lymphocytes after ~48 h of culturing. This led to the estimation of a wide range of doses as well as the influence of dose rate of high and low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. Dicentric analysis is considered for many years to be the “gold standard” assay for biodosimetry and could be used to detect dicentrics immediately and few weeks after irradiation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization-based translocation assay can be used for biodosimetry even decades after exposure. However, the analysis of chromosomal aberrations (i.e., dicentric) in metaphases has several disadvantages, which can cause dose underestimation especially in cases of high-dose irradiation (>4 Gy) because of mitotic cell death and mitotic cell cycle delay that are operating at this dose range. Moreover, the results of these assays could be received no earlier than 48 h after setting up samples for investigation. Another cytogenetic assay, i.e., micronucleus analysis requires 72 h of cell culturing. However, PCC assay can be performed immediately after irradiation and data can be generated within 3–4 h after setting up the experiment as compared to the other existing assays. Therefore, PCC assay appears to be the most suitable assay for estimating doses of exposure soon after blood sampling. Using PCC assay, it may be possible to accurately detect the effect of low doses (<1 Gy) as well as high doses (>4 Gy) following acute exposure to low and high LET ionizing radiation.[2] Furthermore, it was proven that PCC has also the potential to discriminate accurately between total and partial body exposures.[3] All these circumstances led us to consider this technology as a very useful assay for triage people in mass casualty radiation accidents. Therefore, the aim of the investigation is introducing of the technology of PCC - fusion methods into the panel of cytogenetical methods for biodosimetry of radiation exposure in our laboratory.


  Materials and Methods Top


PCC technique is based on fusion G0 cells with mitotic cells. Mitotic promoting factors from mitotic cells induce chromatin condensation of G0 cells. For biological dosimetry, G0 human lymphocytes and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as mitotic cells are used. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a reagent that promotes the fusion reaction; therefore, the reaction is performed in the presence PEG. After cell fusion, chromosomes in hybrid cells present 46 single structures (fragments) that could be easily identified under the microscope.

Collection of mitotic Chinese hamster ovary cells

The CHO cells, line K1 (obtained from cells culture depository “BioloT,” Saint-Petersburg, Russia) was used as mitotic cells for PCC assay. CHO cells were cultured in growth medium consisting of RPMI-1640 (BioloT) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (BioloT) and 1% gentamicin (BioloT). Mitotic cells were harvested according to shake-off procedure [4] and stored at −70°C for later use.

Blood sample collection and lymphocytes isolation

Blood samples were collected from 13 apparently healthy donors (8 males and 3 females) by venipuncture in heparinized tubes. Lymphocytes were isolated from whole peripheral blood using ficoll-hypaque (Sigma) according to the protocol of manufacturer. Isolated cells were used for PCC experiments and for establishing the calibration curve.

Samples irradiation

Isolated lymphocytes were transferred into 25 ml tissue culture flasks, supplemented with 6 ml RPMI-1640 medium with 20% fetal calf serum. Samples were irradiated using a 60 Co source at room temperature at doses of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 Gy at dose rate of 1.2 Gy/min. Lymphocytes were used for PCC analysis 24 h after irradiation.

Induction of premature chromosome condensation

Induction of PCC was performed according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) technical recommendation concerning PCC technology.[1],[4] Hybrid cells were observed under a bright light microscope at ×1000 magnification [Figure 1]. Chromosome fragments were counted. PCC index was determined as a percentage of interphase cells showing prematurely condense chromosomes.
Figure 1: Giemsa stained premature chromosome condensation s in human lymphocytes: (a) Demonstrating 46 single chromatid chromosomes in a nonirradiated lymphocyte; (b) 50 premature chromosome condensation fragments can be visualized in an irradiated lymphocyte

Click here to view


Statistics

Dose-effect relationship was fitted to a linear model using Dose estimaton software.[5]

Ethics

Ethics Committee permission for investigation was received. Informed consent from research participants was obtained.


  Results and Discussion Top


Ideally, advanced biodosimetry laboratory should have a panel of different cytogenetic methods to perform biological dosimetry for different situations: For risk estimation for occupationally or accidental exposed individuals or for general public. Introduction of PCC assay will strengthen the panel of cytogenetic methods and expand the capability of the laboratory in the field of biodosimetry. It is recommended that each laboratory is required to establish its own reference curve. Keeping these points in view, we set out to implement PCC technique in our laboratory and to develop a calibration curve for PCC induced chromosome alterations.

Premature chromosome condensation index estimation

The IAEA technical recommendation concerning PCC technology was followed for the experiments.[1] Preliminary results demonstrated that fusion yields between lymphocytes and mitotic CHO cells are generally low so it was difficult to obtain a sufficient number of hybrid cells in some cases. According to the literature, PCC index could be increased by changing interphase-mitotic cells ratio.[5] It was suggested that 1:5 ratio (CHO cells – lymphocytes) is optimal to receive the highest level of PCC. Our experiments revealed PCC index of 3.6% for this ratio. Other ratio (1:4 and 1:3) demonstrated higher frequency of hybrid cells [Table 1]. The highest level of PCC metaphases was induced at 1:3 ratio (1 × 106 CHO cells and 3 × 106 lymphocytes) and this ratio was used for the next experiments.
Table 1: The results of premature chromosome condensation index estimation

Click here to view


Number of cells examined

The next important question is the number of PCC-cells that should be analyzed to receive statistically relevant results. Chambrette et al.[2] conducted experimental and statistical analyses to determine the required number of observed cells to obtain an acceptable precision for a biological dosimetry assay. To investigate this precision, the excess PCC fragment yield has been established by examining 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 hybrid cells for radiation doses up to 4 Gy. It was shown that confidence limits decrease as expected when more cells are analyzed, but tend to reach a plateau when the number of cells exceeds 150. While it was suggested that 30–50 lymphocytes may be scored for each experimental point,[5] Blakely et al.[3] scored 41–81 PCC cells were counted and Lamadrid Boada et al.[6] analyzed about fifty cells per point Karachristou et al.[7] performed an experiment for the assessment of the minimum number of cells required to detect and discriminate between exposed and unexposed individuals at different dose levels for cases of mass casualties and with respect to the speed of analysis blood samples were irradiated at four different doses i.e. 1.0, 2.0, 3.5, 7.0 Gy and PCC fragments were scored in 10, 20, and 30 cells. Results demonstrated that the analysis of only ten PCC spreads gives satisfactory dose estimates and comparable results to those obtained from the analysis of thirty spreads, even for the exposure of 1 Gy.[7] Therefore, based on the published data, fifty cells per person and per point were counted in our investigation.

Postirradiation time

Earlier reports demonstrated that variability could influence the results of PCC assays and this should be taken into account while planning the experiments. It was shown that the initial yield of PCC fragments soon after irradiation was high, but drop quickly even at 3 h postirradiation and reached plateau at 6–8 h and stayed stable up to 48 h.[7],[8] The rejoining kinetics of excess PCC fragments were highlighted in earlier publications [4],[9],[10] and suggested that PCC assay is sensitive to the delay time between exposure and analysis. Therefore, experimental investigation should be performed in more realistic condition to the accident situation taking into account the kinetics of PCC fragments. Therefore, 24 h repair period was used for the generation of calibration curve in the present study.

Establishment of background frequency of chromosome aberrations for premature chromosome condensation

We used blood from 11 control donors in our study with 8 males and 3 females. Seven samples had more than 46 PCC fragments in some cells; therefore, the mean frequency of PCC fragments was estimated as 46.04 ± 0.001.

Validation of the technology

To determine the technology at the practice experiment with donor blood irradiation was performed, samples of blood were irradiated by X-ray in a dose of 1 Gy. Two analyses - PCC fragments and unstable chromosome aberrations were set up simultaneously. The frequency of dicentrics and PCC fragments were estimated. The dicentric frequency let to reconstruct the dose of irradiation that was in a good agreement with initial dose of irradiation and number of PCC fragments (50.6 ± 0.02) correspond to the published data for dose used in our experimental condition. Therefore, our results suggest that the PCC technique established in our laboratory works properly and it allowed performing the next step of our project calibration curves for γ-irradiation generation and the validation of the PCC assay.

Generation of calibration curve

Peripheral blood from two healthy individuals was used for the development of calibration curve. Isolated lymphocytes were irradiated at different doses ranging from 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 Gy. Yield of PCC fragments was analyzed using Dose estimation program. Frequency PCC fragments in lymphocytes exposed are presented in [Table 2]. The dose-response relationship was better adjusted to a linear model and corresponded to the equitation Y = 0.249 (±0.089) +1.930 (±0.084) D, where Y is the number of PCC fragments per cell, D is the dose of irradiation (Gy) [Figure 2]. The linear dose-effect relationship obtained in this investigation is in agreement with the results of other investigations.[2],[11],[12]
Table 2: Frequency and distribution analysis of premature chromosome condensation fragments after χ-irradiation

Click here to view
Figure 2: Dose response relationship for the yield of premature chromosome condensation fragments after γ-irradiation (weighted χ2 = 28.63, degrees of freedom = 6, P value for goodness of fit = 0.,66, P values for coefficients (Z-test): P_A = 0.03, P_alpha = 0.0000, Correlation coefficient [r] = 0.99)

Click here to view


Therefore, the calibration curve generated using PCC fragments in our laboratory allows us to perform dose estimation in cases of gamma-ray high doses exposure. In the recent years, PCC method has attracted much attention in laboratories because of its potential use in biological dosimetry. Several modifications of this method such as analysis of PCC-ring fragments,[8],[9] analysis PCC-dicentric chromosomes using peptide nucleic acid centromere and telomere probes [10],[11] were recently introduced into practice, and such improvements have increased the capability of this technique in estimating the dose more precisely. Therefore, the introduction of PCC fusion assay as a platform for other PCC-based techniques is the first step toward further strengthening of the biodosimetry laboratories worldwide.

Acknowledgments

Investigation was performed and funded in a frame of CRP E35008 “Strengthening of 'Biological dosimetry' in IAEA Member States: Improvement of current techniques and intensification of collaboration and networking among the different institutes” (2012–2016).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Cytogenetic dosimetry: Applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2011. p. 229.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chambrette V, Laval F, Voisin P. The utility of lymphocyte premature chromosome condensation analysis for biological dosimetry following accidental over exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 1999;82:125-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Blakely WF, Prasanna PG, Kolanko CJ, Pyle MD, Mosbrook DM, Loats AS, et al. Application of the premature chromosome condensation assay in simulated partial-body radiation exposures: Evaluation of the use of an automated metaphase-finder. Stem Cells 1995;13 Suppl 1:223-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ainsbury EA, Lloyd DC. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys 2010;98:290-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pantelias GE, Maillie HD. A simple method for premature chromosome condensation induction in primary human and rodent cells using polyethylene glycol. Somatic Cell Genet 1983;9:533-47.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lamadrid Boada AI, Romero Aguilera I, Terzoudi GI, González Mesa JE, Pantelias G, García O. Rapid assessment of high-dose radiation exposures through scoring of cell-fusion-induced premature chromosome condensation and ring chromosomes. Mutat Res 2013;757:45-51.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Karachristou I, Karakosta M, Pantelias A, Hatzi VI, Karaiskos P, Dimitriou P, et al. Triage biodosimetry using centromeric/telomeric PNA probes and Giemsa staining to score dicentrics or excess fragments in non-stimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2015;793:107-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Suto Y, Gotoh T, Noda T, Akiyama M, Owaki M, Darroudi F, et al. Assessing the applicability of FISH-based prematurely condensed dicentric chromosome assay in triage biodosimetry. Health Phys 2015;108:371-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Vyas RC, Darroudi F, Natarajan AT. Radiation-induced chromosomal breakage and rejoining in interphase-metaphase chromosomes of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 1991;249:29-35.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Darroudi F, Fomina J, Meijers M, Natarajan AT. Kinetics of the formation of chromosome aberrations in X-irradiated human lymphocytes, using PCC and FISH. Mutat Res 1998;404:55-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Darroudi F, Natarajan AT, Bentvelzen PA, Heidt PJ, Van Rotterdam A, Zoetelief J, et al. Detection of total- and partial-body irradiation in a monkey model: A comparative study of chromosomal aberration, micronucleus and premature chromosome condensation assays. Int J Radiat Biol 1998;74:207-15.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Puig R, Barrios L, Pujol M, Caballín MR, Barquinero JF. Suitability of scoring PCC rings and fragments for dose assessment after high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 2013;757:1-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results and Disc...
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed764    
    Printed64    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded71    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]