Home About us Editorial board Browse Articles Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 266
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-5

Micronucleus assay-based evaluation of radiosensitivity of lymphocytes among inhabitants living in high background radiation area of Mamuju, West Sulawesi, Indonesia


1 Nuclear Medicine Technique and Radiation Biology Division, Center for Technology of Radiation Safety and Metrology, National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN), Cilandak, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences, Al-Azhar Indonesia University, Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Radioecology Division, Center for Technology of Radiation Safety and Metrology (PTKMR), National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN), Cilandak, Jakarta, Indonesia

Date of Web Publication31-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Mukh Syaifudin
Nuclear Medicine Technique and Radiation Biology Division, Center for Technology of Radiation Safety and Metrology (PTKMR), National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN), Cilandak, Jakarta
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/genint.genint_2_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Naturally occurring radiation can be found all around us and account for most of the radiation received by human beings each year. Indonesia has a region with high-dose natural radiation located in the suburb of West Sulawesi province with a dose rate up to 2800 nSv/h; however, its impact was not fully understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiosensitivity of 12 peripheral blood lymphocytes of inhabitant from high background radiation area (HBRA) and 10 from normal background radiation area (NBRA) based on cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay after challenged with 1.5 Gy of gamma ray. The analysis of CBMN was done according to standard procedure as per IAEA guidelines, and frequency of binucleate (mitotic) cells with micronuclei (MN) was scored in around 2000 binucleate lymphocytes cells per culture in microscopic analysis. Mean MN frequency for HBRA was lower than that of NBRA (0.121 vs. 0.189) after irradiation, indicating an adaptive response in HBRA group that resulted in less radiosensitivity; however, there was no statistically significant different (P > 0.05) between these two groups. The MN number was higher in women compared to men for both HBRA (0.15 vs. 0.09) and NBRA (0.216 vs. 0.147) groups. Besides, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in Nuclear Division Index (NDI), as measured in 500 metaphase cells with published formula, between HBRA and NBRA samples (1.24 vs. 1.21). The lower MN frequency prompts us to conclude that there is an adaptive response in the lymphocytes of inhabitants as an indicator of lower radiosensitivity to the high natural radiation exposure. Further studies using large number of samples are required to obtain more comprehensive conclusion along with the assessment of other types of radiosensitivity-related biomarkers.

Keywords: Adaptive response, high background radiation area, Mamuju, Micronuclei, normal background radiation area, Nuclear Division Index


How to cite this article:
Syaifudin M, Defiyandra VP, Nurhayati S, Purnami S, Pudjadi E. Micronucleus assay-based evaluation of radiosensitivity of lymphocytes among inhabitants living in high background radiation area of Mamuju, West Sulawesi, Indonesia. Genome Integr 2018;9:1-5

How to cite this URL:
Syaifudin M, Defiyandra VP, Nurhayati S, Purnami S, Pudjadi E. Micronucleus assay-based evaluation of radiosensitivity of lymphocytes among inhabitants living in high background radiation area of Mamuju, West Sulawesi, Indonesia. Genome Integr [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 16];9:1-5. Available from: http://www.genome-integrity.org/text.asp?2018/9/1/1/233640




  Introduction Top


People are constantly exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation naturally present in the environment. This is the major source of human exposure to ionizing radiation which harms the body as it can ionize cell components throughout its path in the cell. The elevated levels of natural radiation such as from radon and the products of its disintegration were found to cause significant cytogenetic alterations.[1] Studies on the health of populations living in high background radiation area (HBRA) are a potential source of information on the effects of chronic low-dose-rate exposures.

Effective biomonitoring for the detection of radiation-induced genotoxicity of radioactive contamination in natural environment involves testing of blood lymphocyte of local residence for cytogenetic changes.[2] Blood, which can be easily accessed, represents a convenient compartment to assess radiation bioindicators. A variety of mutagenicity test procedures has been developed which enables the detection of DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation. These assays are useful in determining the adverse effects caused by radionuclides in the environment. A method which has high sensitivity to be used for biomonitoring in elevated natural radiation area is cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) that frequently used for evaluating genotoxic effects and chromosome instability in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.[3] It is one of the most reliable biomarker and established assays for biological dosimetry.[4]

MNs are masses of DNA that resemble small nuclei located in the cytoplasm of cells, rather than being within the nuclear membrane.[5] The MNs are simple structure independently and easy to identify. MN is formed during cell division that has been subject to exposure to many mutagens, including radiation, resulting in chromosome breaks or spindle dysfunction and a binucleated appearance in cells that have undergone cellular division. MN can be detected using light microscopy, with the number of cells containing MN within a cell population being related to the extent of cytogenetic damage.[6],[7] The MN assay has been used in a wide range of studies, both in the laboratory and the field to assess the cytogenetic impact of exposure of different organisms to pollutants [8] and data can be generated in a short period.[9] Beside that information on the cell death by apoptotic and necrosis, and other cytogenetic damage biomarkers such as nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds can be simultaneously obtained from the same slides.

The annual effective radiation dose from natural and man-made sources for the world's population is about 3 mSv, where nearly 80% of this dose comes from natural background radiation, although levels of natural radiation can vary greatly, even within countries as well.[10],[11] The primary radioactive elements in the earth's crust that lead to human exposure are potassium, uranium, thorium, and their radioactive decay products (e.g., radium, radon, etc.). Mamuju has been reported for its high radiation dose rate due to these element contents in the soil of that area. On gamma dose rate map of Indonesia, this suburb area of West Sulawesi shows the highest average dose rate compared to other region in Sulawesi Island and even Indonesia, which can be at 2800 nSv/h.[12] Although extensive knowledge of radiation risks has been acquired in previous studies, the health effects of chronic low-level radiation exposure in that area are still poorly understood.

Preliminary studies by Nurhayati et al.[13] and Syaifudin et al.[14] on the cytogenetic effects revealed that MN number in lymphocyte of HBRA was higher compared to that of normal background radiation area (NBRA) with no significant difference was found between groups. The present study evaluated the radiosensitivity of lymphocytes of local residents exposed chronically to low-dose radiation exposure in HBRAs of Mamuju, which has an annual effective dose (HE) of 6.15 ± 0.81 mSv [15], after being irradiated with a challenge dose.


  Materials and Methods Top


Blood sampling and ethical approval

Twelve healthy adult participants (6 males and 6 females) from Botteng Village as HBRA at Mamuju District of West Sulawesi Province and 10 (4 males and 6 females) from normal background radiation area (NBRA) of Keang Village of the same district as NBRA were included in this study. Peripheral blood samples were collected by venipuncture using heparinized vacutainer tubes (BD Vacutainer systems). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Health Research and Development, Indonesian Ministry of Health, with the number of LB.02.01/5.2.KE.051/2015, January 29, 2015. Informed consent was obtained from all donors. A detailed questionnaire was provided to obtain information on age and occupation and other biodata. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Irradiation of the blood as challenge dose

The blood samples were irradiated at dose of 1.5 Gy with gamma rays from the 60 Co source at a dose rate of 0.38 Gy/min. Irradiation process was performed in the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory at Center for Technology of Radiation Safety and Metrology, National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN) located in Jakarta. The sample was placed inside the acrylic box with dimension of 30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm containing water with maintained temperature of 37°C during irradiation.

Micronucleus assay and Nuclear Division Index

Peripheral blood samples were cultured according to the MN assay protocol in IAEA publication.[16] Two cultures were setup in 15 mL centrifuge tube for each blood sample. Whole blood samples were cultured for 72 h in the incubator at 37°C containing 5% CO2. The culture medium consisted of 4.5 mL of Rosewell Park Memorial Institute 1640 supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 1% streptomycin-penicillin, and 0.1 mL of phytohemagglutinin (PHA). At 44 h, post-PHA stimulation, cytochalasin B (an inhibitor of the spindle assembly) at a final concentration of 6 μg/ml was added to all the culture tubes. The cells were then centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 rpm and re-suspended in 7 ml of 0.075 M cold (4°C) KCl. The cells then were centrifuged again for 8 min at 1000 rpm and re-suspended in freshly made fixative consisting of methanol: acetic acid (10:1) diluted 1:1 with Ringer's solution. The cells then were washed with two to three further changes of freshly prepared fixative until the cell suspension is clear. The cell suspension then was stored in-20°C at least for one night until the slide preparation was conducted. Fixed cells were dropped onto clean, wet slides, dried, and stained with 4% Giemsa solution (pH 6.8). The scoring criteria were based on the methods described by IAEA [16], Fenech,[9] and Vral et al.[17] and have been implemented in our previous studies.[18],[19],[20] Two thousand binucleated lymphocytes were scored at the magnification of 1000 times under microscope observation and immersion oil.

For Nuclear Division Index (NDI), each slide in each sample, the proportion of mononucleated, binucleated, trinucleated, and tetranucleated cells per 500 cells scored was assessed. NDI was calculated based on the following formula where M1, M2, M3, and M4 indicate the number of cells with one, two, three, and four nuclei and N is the total number of cells analyzed.[9],[16]



Statistical analysis

Using SPSS 22.0 (IBM United States Software Announcement 213-309) statistical software, unpaired t-test was used to compare the MN number between HBRA and control groups before and after irradiation if the data have a normal distribution. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to determine the distribution of data.


  Results Top


This small-scale and simple evaluation was conducted to evaluate the frequency of genotoxic effects of natural radiation in HBRA of Mamuju by focusing on the MN induction within very limited number of subjects. MN can be produced by chromosome breaks and failure in DNA repair machinery is summarized in [Table 1]. As shown in the [Table 1], MN number and its frequency in HBRA group after challenged with gamma ray at dose of 1.5 Gy were lower than that of NBRA (240.92 vs. 377.60 and 0.121 vs. 0.189), indicating an adaptive response of lymphocyte cells that lead to less radiosensitive cells in HBRA group.[21] However, there was no statistically difference (P > 0.05) between these two groups as measured in independent sample t-test. From these, chronic low-dose radiation in Botteng, Mamuju did not have a significant effect on MN frequency among respondents.
Table 1: The mean micronuclei numbers and nuclear division index of high background radiation area as study group and normal background radiation area as control samples (female; male) after being irradiated with gamma rays at 1.5 Gy

Click here to view


The mean background MN in this evaluation was 46.54 from 26,175 binucleated cells and 42.40 from 22,312 cells in HBRA and NBRA, respectively. There is slightly higher MN was found in study area. For nonirradiated samples, it is comparable with previous research,[13],[14] where the mean MN number were 44.25 ± 13.78 from totally 154,443 BNC that were scored in 70 individuals from HBRA. It means that 1.5 Gy irradiation as challenge dose caused the increase of MN frequency up to around 6 times (0.121 vs. 0.020). In control group of that previous study, a total 39,866 BNC were scored in 18 individuals from NBRA, with the mean MN numbers per binucleated cells were 37.94 ± 10.59, so that 1.5 Gy irradiation increased up to 11 times higher frequency of MN (0.189 vs. 0.017). Again this means that high natural radiation in Botteng village might have a role in the lesser radiosensitivity of the blood lymphocyte of residents.

Age and gender may be important demographic variables in determining the MN frequency. With the assumption that younger individuals may be more susceptible to the effects of environmental radiation, we divided the samples into two groups, <50 years old (8 samples for HBRA and 5 for NBRA), and >50 years old (6 samples for HBRA and 5 for NBRA). The MN frequency between younger and older individuals is not significantly (P > 0.05) different [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Frequency of Micronucleus for high background radiation area and normal background radiation area according to the age group of respondents

Click here to view


Ramachandran et al.[22] observed significantly lower frequency of MN in elder (>40 years) individuals from high-dose group of HBRA as compared to the young (≤40 years) individuals after 1.0 Gy (P < 0.001) and 2.0 Gy (P = 0.002) of challenging doses. However, the basal frequency of MN was also comparable across NBRA and HBRA group (P = 0.64). An example of MN in a cytoplasm containing binucleated cells as shown in [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Microscopic view of binucleated cells with 1 MN (a), 2 MNs (b), 3 MNs (c) and 4 MNs (d) (arrows) at × 1000. MN: Micronucleus

Click here to view


When the results were grouped according to the gender, the MN number was found to be higher in women compared to men for both HBRA (0.15 vs. 0.09) and NBRA (0.216 vs. 0.147) groups [Figure 3]. This is comparable to previous study [13] where the mean MN numbers per BNC cells in females was higher compared to males in both groups. This is also observed by Alsbeih et al.[23] that revealed that females and males differed significantly in radiosensitivity (P = 0.004) that impacted genetic or single nucleotide polymorphisms association where only XRCC1 gene remained significant in both genders (P < 0.05).
Figure 3: Frequency of micronucleus of male and female respondents from both high background radiation area and normal background radiation area

Click here to view


Beside the frequency of MN according to age and sex/gender groups described above, the influence of natural radiation exposure to the nuclear division was also studied. Here, the NDI was calculated with published formula [Table 1], and there was no statistically different (P > 0.05) found in NDI, as calculated in 500 metaphase cells, between HBRA and NBRA samples (1.24 vs. 1.21). It is suggested that natural radiation did not significantly affect the nuclear division of lymphocytes. Examples of mononucleated, binucleated, trinucleated, and tetranucleated cells with clear cytoplasm under microscope are shown in [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Microscopic view of lymphocyte with one/mononucleate (a), two/binucleate (b), three/trinucleate (c), and four/tetranucleate (d), cells.

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Humans are exposed to ionizing radiation from many sources, including naturally occurring radionuclides, such as cosmic and terrestrial, for example, radon gas.[24] Radioactivity is a part of our earth where naturally occurring radioactive materials are present in every things in our life. Background levels of radiation can vary greatly from one location to the next. The average global exposure to natural radiation is 2.4 mSv/year. Doses over 100 mSv can have a harmful effect on humans such as a higher incidence of developing cancer.[25] Integrated molecular analysis conducted by Olipitz et al.[26] indicates undetectable change in DNA damage in mouse after continuous irradiation with dose at about 400-fold natural background radiation.

Ionizing radiation induces gene mutations and cellular death in the target cells. Efforts have been made in the development of techniques for measuring radiation damage in biological systems. Among these techniques, MN test has shown as a good biomarker of DNA damage, being widely used in environmental monitoring to detect genotoxic agents [27] and also very useful in monitoring a large number of population [28] because of its simplified technique. MN frequencies in human T lymphocytes represent accumulated genetic changes resulting from the spontaneous or induced chromosome breakage/loss induced by physical and chemical agents. Its size in human lymphocytes varies according to inducing agent,[29] and the frequency of MN is in a radiation dose-dependent. Besides its reliability and good reproducibility, CBMN assay has become one of the standard cytogenetic tests for genetic toxicology tests in human and mammalian cells.[9] The collaborative study group for the MN test based on strain and sex differences, as well as single versus multiple dosing, including mouse peripheral blood erythrocytes stained by acridine orange have been done.[6] Using this technique, differentiation can be done between the MN induced by spindle-damaging agents such as vincristine and colcemid, and those caused by agents that directly damaging the chromosomes such as mitomycin-C and X-rays. This may be because the spindle-damaging agents preferentially produces chromatid fragments while mitomycin-C and X-rays produce chromosome fragments.[29]

Karuppasamy et al.[30] found that the overall frequency of MN was 11.7 per 1000 BN cells. The frequencies of MN in the HBRA was 11.7 and NBRA was 11.6 and were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.59). However, a statistically significant (P < 0.001) age-dependent increase in MN frequency was observed among individuals from both HBRA and NBRA. Whereas Ramachandran et al.[31] studied in a total of 1,267,788 metaphases from 27,295 newborns of mothers aged 17–45 years were analyzed during 1986–2007. Frequencies of dicentrics in high and normal level radiation areas were 1.90 ± 0.14 and 2.01 ± 0.26 per 10,000 cells, respectively. Frequencies of other biomarkers such as chromosomal aberration and karyotype anomalies between the newborns from the HBRA and NBRA were very similar.

In this study, nuclear abnormalities in peripheral blood of individuals living in Mamuju was only focused on MN, whereas other forms of nuclear abnormalities such as nuclear bud or blebbed cells and binucleated cells with nucleoplasmic bridges were not considered.[9] The results obtained here are from a limited number of cases, and some major confounding factors were not controlled for. It should be noted that above and beyond the unavoidable difficulties associated with study of exposure to HBRA, the estimation of cancer risk will be extremely difficult to accomplish with high precision. Understanding the health impacts of low-level chronic public exposure is also critical to provide a rational basis for regulating radiation exposure in today's society.


  Conclusion Top


Overall, the present study concludes that the MN frequency in lymphocytes of HBRA was lower than that of NBRA where this biomarker was affected by age and sex. Further investigations into different types of DNA damage biomarkers are warranted to fully elucidate the role of environmental radioactivity to the health status of inhabitants living in Mamuju.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Sinitsky MY, Druzhinin VG. The application of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay on peripheral blood lymphocytes for the assessment of genome damage in long-term residents of areas with high radon concentration. J Radiat Res 2014;55:61-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Watanabe Y, Kubota Y, Fuma S, Kouichi M, Ichikawa S, Kubota M, et al. Cytokinesis block micronucleus assay in field plants for monitoring radiation-induced genotoxicity of the environment. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2014;774:41-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Huang Y, Fenech M, Shi Q. Micronucleus formation detected by live-cell imaging. Mutagenesis 2011;26:133-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wojcik A, Kowalska M, Bouzyk E, Buraczewska I, Kobialko G, Jarocewicz N, et al. Validation of the micronucleus-centromere assay for biological dosimetry. Genet Mol Biol 2000;23:1083-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hebert PD, Luiker MM. Genetic effects of contaminant exposure – towards an assessment of impacts on animal populations. Sci Total Environ 1996;191:23-58.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hayashi M. The micronucleus test-most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test. Genes Environ 2016;38:18.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Villela IV, de Oliveira IM, da Silva J, Henriques JA. DNA damage and repair in haemolymph cells of golden mussel (Limnoperna fortunei) exposed to environmental contaminants. Mutat Res 2006;605:78-86.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Syaza SK, Umar R, Hazmin SN, Kamarudin MK, Hassan A, Juahir H. Non-ionizing radiation as threat in daily life. J Fundament Appl Sci 2017;9 2 Suppl: 308-16.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fenech M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc 2007;2:1084-104.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Knudsen LE, Hansen AM. Biomarkers of intermediate endpoints in environmental and occupational health. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007;210:461-70.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tzortzis M, Svoukis E, Tsertos H. A comprehensive study of natural gamma radioactivity levels and associated dose rates from surface soils in cyprus. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004;109:217-24.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Syaeful H, Sukadana IG, Sumaryanto A. Radiometric mapping for naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) assessment in Mamuju, West Sulawesi. Atom Indonesia 2014;40:33-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Nurhayati M, Purnami S, Syaifudin M. Cytogenetic Evaluation in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Individuals Living in High Natural Background Radiation of Botteng Village, Mamuju. Proceedings 2nd International Conference on the Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation (SERIR2). Bali; September 5, 2016. p. 80-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Syaifudin M, Purnami S, Rahardjo T, Kurnia I, Rahajeng N, Darlina et al. Cytogenetic and molecular damages in blood lymphocyte of inhabitants living in high level natural radiation area (HLNRA) of Botteng Village, Mamuju, West Sulawesi. Radiat Environ Med [In Press].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Alatas Z, Lusiyanti Y, Purnami S, Ramadhani D, Lubis M, Viria AS. Cytogenetics response of community living in high natural radiation in Mamuju Regency, West Sulawesi. Journal of Indonesian Nuclear Science and Technology 2012;13:13-26.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Biological Dosimetry Chromosomal Aberration Analysis For Dose Assessments. Technical Reports Series No. 260. Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 2001. p. 25-31.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Vral A, Fenech M, Thierens H. The micronucleus assay as a biological dosimeter of in vivo ionising radiation exposure. Mutagenesis 2011;26:11-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Syaifudin M, Lusiyanti Y, Purnami S, Lee YS, Kang CM. Assessment of ionizing radiation induced dicentric chromosome and micronuclei in human peripheral blood lymphocytes for preliminary reconstruction of cytogenetic biodosimetry. Atom Indonesia 2017;43:47-54.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lusiyanti Y, Alatas Z, Syaifudin M. Lack of radioprotective potential of ginseng in suppressing micronuclei frequency in human blood lymphocyte under gamma irradiation. Hayati J Biosci 2015;22:93-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lusiyanti Y, Alatas Z, Syaifudin M, Purnami S. Establishment of a dose-response curve for X-ray-induced micronuclei in human lymphocytes. Genome Integr 2016;7:7.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
Defiyandra VP. Study on the Adaptive Response of Micronuclei in Lymphocyte Cells of Residents Living in High Natural Radiation Area of Mamuju District, West Sulawesi. B. Sc. Thesis of Indonesia Al-azhar University. Jakarta; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ramachandran EN, Karuppasamy CV, Kumar VA, Soren DC, Kumar PR, Koya PK, et al. Radio-adaptive response in peripheral blood lymphocytes of individuals residing in high-level natural radiation areas of Kerala in the Southwest Coast of India. Mutagenesis 2017;32:267-73.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Alsbeih G, Al-Meer RS, Al-Harbi N, Bin Judia S, Al-Buhairi M, Venturina NQ, et al. Gender bias in individual radiosensitivity and the association with genetic polymorphic variations. Radiother Oncol 2016;119:236-43.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Suzuki K, Yamashita S. Low-dose radiation exposure and carcinogenesis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012;42:563-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hendry JH, Simon SL, Wojcik A, Sohrabi M, Burkart W, Cardis E, et al. Human exposure to high natural background radiation: What can it teach us about radiation risks? J Radiol Prot 2009;29:A29-42.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Olipitz W, Wiktor-Brown D, Shuga J, Pang B, McFaline J, Lonkar P, et al. Integrated molecular analysis indicates undetectable change in DNA damage in mice after continuous irradiation at ~ 400-fold natural background radiation. Environ Health Perspect 2012;120:1130-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Silva LR, Silva EB, da Silva RC, Amâncio FF, Melo MM. Micronuclei as Biomarkers of Genotoxicity of Gamma Radiation in Aquatic Environments. 2011 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference-INAC 2011. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; October 24-28, 2011.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
An MY, Kim TH. Frequencies of micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes in Korean populations after chronic low-dose radiation exposure. J Vet Sci 2002;3:213-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Högstedt B, Karlsson A. The size of micronuclei in human lymphocytes varies according to inducing agent used. Mutat Res 1985;156:229-32.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Karuppasamy CV, Ramachandran EN, Kumar VA, Kumar PR, Koya PK, Jaikrishan G, et al. Peripheral blood lymphocyte micronucleus frequencies in men from areas of Kerala, India, with high vs. normal levels of natural background ionizing radiation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2016;800-801:40-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Ramachandran EN, Karuppasamy CV, Cheriyan VD, Soren DC, Das B, Anilkumar V, et al. Cytogenetic studies on newborns from high and normal level natural radiation areas of Kerala in Southwest Coast of India. Int J Radiat Biol 2013;89:259-67.  Back to cited text no. 31
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed214    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded38    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]